Post by Red Hairdo on Jun 23, 2009 21:25:06 GMT -5
[offtopic]
Well, as a matter of fact, Melee is "a billion" times more dynamic in gameplay. So to put it simply, Brawl gets boring much faster. Even Smash 64 is more dynamic, despite having less gameplay options, ironicaly.
There are tons of other reasons as well, but that's enough, for something offtopic. xD
Though through the casual gamer's eyes, that evidence may not be as clear. But to real veterans and "professionals", it is SO crystal clear. But there's a saying among us Smashers that is "Smash is Smash", so both are still very likable.
If you get a Wii, you can run both though, so if you don't have either a GC or Wii, go for the latter. (Smash 64 is available for the Virtual console, as well.)
Unless you plan to use a GC Action Replay to hack the heck (heh) out of Melee, in which you would probably need a GC. But I don't think it's the case. xD
[/offtopic]
Well, as a matter of fact, Melee is "a billion" times more dynamic in gameplay. So to put it simply, Brawl gets boring much faster. Even Smash 64 is more dynamic, despite having less gameplay options, ironicaly.
There are tons of other reasons as well, but that's enough, for something offtopic. xD
Though through the casual gamer's eyes, that evidence may not be as clear. But to real veterans and "professionals", it is SO crystal clear. But there's a saying among us Smashers that is "Smash is Smash", so both are still very likable.
If you get a Wii, you can run both though, so if you don't have either a GC or Wii, go for the latter. (Smash 64 is available for the Virtual console, as well.)
Unless you plan to use a GC Action Replay to hack the heck (heh) out of Melee, in which you would probably need a GC. But I don't think it's the case. xD
[/offtopic]
